NCERT Solution for Class 12 Physics Chapter 13: Nuclei
The NCERT Solutions for Class 12 Physics Chapter 13: Nuclei have the appropriate descriptions to the tiny details emphasized in nuclear structure and in the forces that bind the nucleus. The chapter goes on to explain the constituents of the nucleus, the concept of the nucleus's nuclear forces, and the stability of the nuclei. The Class 12 Physics Chapter 13 solutions explain concepts in great detail, such as mass defect, binding energy, nuclear fission, and fusion, which are extremely important for the understanding of how energy is produced in nuclear reactions. Class 12 Physics Chapter 13 PDF document makes it easier for students, without any hassle, to get these explanations and diagrams that clearly depict these concepts. Therefore, for a student wishing to further his studies in the application of nuclear energy, astrophysics, and medical physics, good knowledge of nuclear physics is a must. NCERT Solution for Sodium Class 12 explains complicated concepts about the shell model of the nucleus and processes for radioactive decay in simple words. Detailed solutions provide a step-by-step guide to solving numericals, leaving the student's classroom test well prepared. On top of that, such solutions cover critical exam questions enabling a student to understand the most relevant features of the chapter.
Download PDF For NCERT Solutions for Physics Nuclei
The NCERT Solution for Class 12 Physics Chapter 13: Nuclei are tailored to help the students master the concepts that are key to success in their classrooms. The solutions given in the PDF are developed by experts and correlate with the CBSE syllabus of 2023-2024. These solutions provide thorough explanations with a step-by-step approach to solving problems. Students can easily get a hold of the subject and learn the basics with a deeper understanding. Additionally, they can practice better, be confident, and perform well in their examinations with the support of this PDF.
Download PDF
Access Answers to NCERT Solution for Class 12 Physics Chapter 13: Nuclei
Students can access the NCERT Solution for Class 12 Physics Chapter 13: Nuclei. Curated by experts according to the CBSE syllabus for 2023–2024, these step-by-step solutions make Physics much easier to understand and learn for the students. These solutions can be used in practice by students to attain skills in solving problems, reinforce important learning objectives, and be well-prepared for tests.
Nuclei
A 12.5 eV electron beam is used to bombard gaseous hydrogen at room temperature. What series of wavelengths will be emitted?
It is given that the energy of the electron beam used to bombard gaseous hydrogen at room temperature is 12.5 eV. Also, the energy of the gaseous hydrogen in its ground state at room temperature is −13.6 eV.
When gaseous hydrogen is bombarded with an electron beam, the energy of the gaseous hydrogen becomes −13.6 + 12.5 eV i.e., −1.1 eV.
Orbital energy is related to orbit level (n) as:
For n = 3,
This energy is approximately equal to the energy of gaseous hydrogen. It can be concluded that the electron has jumped from n = 1 to n = 3 level.
During its de-excitation, the electrons can jump from n = 3 to n = 1 directly, which forms a line of the Lyman series of the hydrogen spectrum.
We have the relation for wave number for Lyman series as:
Where,
Ry = Rydberg constant = 1.097 × 107 m−1
λ= Wavelength of radiation emitted by the transition of the electron
For n = 3, we can obtain λas:
If the electron jumps from n = 2 to n = 1, then the wavelength of the radiation is given as:
If the transition takes place from n = 3 to n = 2, then the wavelength of the radiation is given as:
This radiation corresponds to the Balmer series of the hydrogen spectrum.
Hence, in the Lyman series, two wavelengths i.e., 102.5 nm and 121.5 nm are emitted. And in the Balmer series, one wavelength i.e., 656.33 nm is emitted.
Obtain the first Bohr’s radius and the ground state energy of a muonic hydrogen atom [i.e., an atom in which a negatively charged muon (μ−) of mass about 207me orbits around a proton].
Mass of a negatively charged muon,
According to Bohr’s model,
Bohr radius,
And, energy of a ground state electronic hydrogen atom,
We have the value of the first Bohr orbit,
Let rμ be the radius of a muonic hydrogen atom.
At equilibrium, we can write the relation as:
Hence, the value of the first Bohr radius of a muonic hydrogen atom is
2.56 × 10−13 m.
We have,
Ee= − 13.6 eV
Take the ratio of these energies as:
Hence, the ground state energy of a muonic hydrogen atom is −2.81 keV.
Choose the correct alternative from the clues given at the end of the each statement:
(a) Size of an atom in Rutherford’s model is _________ the size of an atom compared to Thomson's model. (Less than, Greater than, no different than)
(b) Even in the case of stable equilibrium _________ electrons experience a net force, though _______ electrons do not. [Rutherford’s model, Thomson’s model]
(c) _____ is a showcase of a model of an atom which is bound to fail. [Rutherford’s model, Thomson’s model]
(d) Mass distribution is uniform in __________ but highly irregular in ___________ . [Rutherford’s model, Thomson’s model, both the models]
(e) _____ states that a larger portion of the mass of an atom is contributed by the positively charged part.
(a) Size of an atom in Rutherford’s model is the same as the size of an atom compared to Thomson's model.
(b) Even in the case of stable equilibrium Rutherford’s model electrons experience a net force, though Thomson’s model electrons do not.
(c) Rutherford’s model is a showcase model of an atom which is bound to fail.
(d) Mass distribution is uniform in Thomson’s model but highly irregular in Rutherford’s model.
(e) Both of the models state that a larger portion of the mass of an atom is contributed by the positively charged part.
Suppose you are given a chance to repeat the alpha-particle scattering experiment using a thin sheet of solid hydrogen in place of the gold foil. (Hydrogen is a solid at temperatures below 14 K.) What results do you expect?
In the alpha-particle scattering experiment, if a thin sheet of solid hydrogen is used in place of a gold foil, then the scattering angle would not be large enough. This is because the mass of hydrogen (1.67 × 10−27 kg) is less than the mass of incident α−particles (6.64 × 10−27 kg). Thus, the mass of the scattering particle is more than the target nucleus (hydrogen). As a result, the α−particles would not bounce back if solid hydrogen is used in the α-particle scattering experiment.
What is the shortest wavelength present in the Paschen series of spectral lines?
Rydberg’s formula is given as:
Where,
h = Planck’s constant = 6.6 × 10−34 Js
c = Speed of light = 3 × 108 m/s
(n1 and n2 are integers)
The shortest wavelength present in the Paschen series of the spectral lines is given for values n1 = 3 and n2 = ∞.
A difference of 2.3 eV separates two energy levels in an atom. What is the frequency of radiation emitted when the atom makes a transition from the upper level to the lower level?
Separation of two energy levels in an atom,
E = 2.3 eV
= 2.3 × 1.6 × 10−19
= 3.68 × 10−19 J
Let ν be the frequency of radiation emitted when the atom transits from the upper level to the lower level.
We have the relation for energy as:
E = hv
Where,
h = Planck’s constant
Hence, the frequency of the radiation is 5.6 × 1014 Hz.
The ground state energy of a hydrogen atom is −13.6 eV. What are the kinetic and potential energies of the electron in this state?
Ground state energy of hydrogen atom, E = − 13.6 eV
This is the total energy of a hydrogen atom. Kinetic energy is equal to the negative of the total energy.
Kinetic energy = − E = − (− 13.6) = 13.6 eV
Potential energy is equal to the negative of two times of kinetic energy.
Potential energy = − 2 × (13.6) = − 27 .2 eV
A hydrogen atom initially in the ground level absorbs a photon, which excites it to the n = 4 level. Determine the wavelength and frequency of the photon.
For ground level, n1 = 1
Let E1 be the energy of this level. It is known that E1 is related with n1 as:
The atom is excited to a higher level, n2 = 4.
Let E2 be the energy of this level.
The amount of energy absorbed by the photon is given as:
E = E2 − E1
For a photon of wavelengthλ, the expression of energy is written as:
Where,
h = Planck’s constant = 6.6 × 10−34 Js
c = Speed of light = 3 × 108 m/s
And, frequency of a photon is given by the relation,
Hence, the wavelength of the photon is 97 nm while the frequency is 3.1 × 1015 Hz.
(a) Using the Bohr’s model calculate the speed of the electron in a hydrogen atom in the n = 1, 2, and 3 levels. (b) Calculate the orbital period in each of these levels.
(a) Let ν1 be the orbital speed of the electron in a hydrogen atom in the ground state level, n1 = 1. For charge (e) of an electron, ν1 is given by the relation,
Where,
e = 1.6 × 10−19 C
∈0 = Permittivity of free space = 8.85 × 10−12 N−1 C2 m−2
h = Planck’s constant = 6.62 × 10−34 Js
For level n2 = 2, we can write the relation for the corresponding orbital speed as:
And, for n3 = 3, we can write the relation for the corresponding orbital speed as:
Hence, the speed of the electron in a hydrogen atom in n = 1, n=2, and n=3 is 2.18 × 106 m/s, 1.09 × 106 m/s, 7.27 × 105 m/s respectively.
(b) Let T1 be the orbital period of the electron when it is in level n1 = 1.
Orbital period is related to orbital speed as:
Where,
r1 = Radius of the orbit
h = Planck’s constant = 6.62 × 10−34 Js
e = Charge on an electron = 1.6 × 10−19 C
∈0 = Permittivity of free space = 8.85 × 10−12 N−1 C2 m−2
m = Mass of an electron = 9.1 × 10−31 kg
For level n2 = 2, we can write the period as:
Where,
r2 = Radius of the electron in n2 = 2
And, for level n3 = 3, we can write the period as:
Where,
r3 = Radius of the electron in n3 = 3
Hence, the orbital period in each of these levels is 1.52 × 10−16 s, 1.22 × 10−15 s, and 4.12 × 10−15 s respectively.
The radius of the innermost electron orbit of a hydrogen atom is 5.3 ×10−11 m. What are the radii of the n = 2 and n =3 orbits?
The radius of the innermost orbit of a hydrogen atom, r1 = 5.3 × 10−11 m.
Let r2 be the radius of the orbit at n = 2. It is related to the radius of the innermost orbit as:
For n = 3, we can write the corresponding electron radius as:
Hence, the radii of an electron for n = 2 and n = 3 orbits are 2.12 × 10−10 m and 4.77 × 10−10 m respectively.
In accordance with the Bohr’s model, find the quantum number that characterizes the earth’s revolution around the sun in an orbit of radius 1.5 × 1011 m with orbital speed 3 × 104 m/s. (Mass of earth = 6.0 × 1024 kg.)
Radius of the orbit of the Earth around the Sun, r = 1.5 × 1011 m
Orbital speed of the Earth, ν = 3 × 104 m/s
Mass of the Earth, m = 6.0 × 1024 kg
According to Bohr’s model, angular momentum is quantized and given as:
Where,
h = Planck’s constant = 6.62 × 10−34 Js
n = Quantum number
Hence, the quanta number that characterizes the Earth’ revolution is 2.6 × 1074.
Answer the following questions, which help you understand the difference between Thomson’s model and Rutherford’s model better.
(a) Is the average angle of deflection of α-particles by a thin gold foil predicted by Thomson’s model much less, about the same, or much greater than that predicted by Rutherford’s model?
(b) Is the probability of backward scattering (i.e., scattering of α-particles at angles greater than 90°) predicted by Thomson’s model much less, about the same, or much greater than that predicted by Rutherford’s model?
(c) Keeping other factors fixed, it is found experimentally that for small thickness t, the number of α-particles scattered at moderate angles is proportional to t. What clue does this linear dependence on t provide?
(d) In which model is it completely wrong to ignore multiple scattering for the calculation of average angle of scattering of α-particles by a thin foil?
(a) about the same
The average angle of deflection of α-particles by a thin gold foil predicted by Thomson’s model is about the same size as predicted by Rutherford’s model. This is because the average angle was taken in both models.
(b) much less
The probability of scattering of α-particles at angles greater than 90° predicted by Thomson’s model is much less than that predicted by Rutherford’s model.
(c) Scattering is mainly due to single collisions. The chance of a single collision increases linearly with the number of target atoms. Since the number of target atoms increase with an increase in thickness, the collision probability depends linearly on the thickness of the target.
(d) Thomson’s model
It is wrong to ignore multiple scattering in Thomson’s model for the calculation of average angle of scattering of α−particles by a thin foil. This is because a single collision causes very little deflection in this model. Hence, the observed average scattering angle can be explained only by considering multiple scattering.
The gravitational attraction between electron and proton in a hydrogen atom is weaker than the coulomb attraction by a factor of about 10−40. An alternative way of looking at this fact is to estimate the radius of the first Bohr orbit of a hydrogen atom if the electron and proton were bound by gravitational attraction. You will find the answer interesting.
Radius of the first Bohr orbit is given by the relation,
Where,
∈0 = Permittivity of free space
h = Planck’s constant = 6.63 × 10−34 Js
me = Mass of an electron = 9.1 × 10−31 kg
e = Charge of an electron = 1.9 × 10−19 C
mp = Mass of a proton = 1.67 × 10−27 kg
r = Distance between the electron and the proton
Coulomb attraction between an electron and a proton is given as:
Gravitational force of attraction between an electron and a proton is given as:
Where,
G = Gravitational constant = 6.67 × 10−11 N m2/kg2
If the electrostatic (Coulomb) force and the gravitational force between an electron and a proton are equal, then we can write:
∴FG = FC
Putting the value of equation (4) in equation (1), we get:
It is known that the universe is 156 billion light years wide or 1.5 × 1027 m wide. Hence, we can conclude that the radius of the first Bohr orbit is much greater than the estimated size of the whole universe.
Obtain an expression for the frequency of radiation emitted when a hydrogen atom de-excites from level n to level (n−1). For large n, show that this frequency equals the classical frequency of revolution of the electron in the orbit.
It is given that a hydrogen atom de-excites from an upper level (n) to a lower level (n−1).
We have the relation for energy (E1) of radiation at level n as:
Now, the relation for energy (E2) of radiation at level (n − 1) is givenas:
Energy (E) released as a result of de-excitation:
E = E2−E1
hν = E2 − E1 … (iii)
Where,
ν = Frequency of radiation emitted
Putting values from equations (i) and (ii) in equation (iii), we get:
For large n, we can write
Classical relation of frequency of revolution of an electron is given as:
Where,
Velocity of the electron in the nth orbit is given as:
And, radius of the nth orbit is given as:
Putting the values of equations (vi) and (vii) in equation (v), we get:
Hence, the frequency of radiation emitted by the hydrogen atom is equal to its classical orbital frequency.
Classically, an electron can be in any orbit around the nucleus of an atom. Then what determines the typical atomic size? Why is an atom not, say, thousand times bigger than its typical size? The question had greatly puzzled Bohr before he arrived at his famous model of the atom that you have learnt in the text. To simulate what he might well have done before his discovery, let us play as follows with the basic constants of nature and see if we can get a quantity with the dimensions of length that is roughly equal to the known size of an atom (~ 10−10 m).
(a) Construct a quantity with the dimensions of length from the fundamental constants e, me, and c. Determine its numerical value.
(b) You will find that the length obtained in (a) is many orders of magnitude smaller than the atomic dimensions. Further, it involves c. But energies of atoms are mostly in non-relativistic domains where c is not expected to play any role. This is what may have suggested Bohr to discard c and look for ‘something else’ to get the right atomic size. Now, Planck's constant h had already made its appearance elsewhere. Bohr’s great insight lay in recognising that h, me, and e will yield the right atomic size. Construct a quantity with the dimension of length from h, me, and e and confirm that its numerical value has indeed the correct order of magnitude.
(a) Charge on an electron, e = 1.6 × 10−19 C
Mass of an electron, me = 9.1 × 10−31 kg
Speed of light, c = 3 ×108 m/s
Let us take a quantity involving the given quantities as
Where,
∈0 = Permittivity of free space
And,
The numerical value of the taken quantity will be:
Hence, the numerical value of the taken quantity is much smaller than the typical size of an atom.
(b) Charge on an electron, e = 1.6 × 10−19 C
Mass of an electron, me = 9.1 × 10−31 kg
Planck’s constant, h = 6.63 ×10−34 Js
Let us take a quantity involving the given quantities as
Where,
∈0 = Permittivity of free space
And,
The numerical value of the taken quantity will be:
Hence, the value of the quantity taken is of the order of the atomic size.
The total energy of an electron in the first excited state of the hydrogen atom is about −3.4 eV.
(a) What is the kinetic energy of the electron in this state?
(b) What is the potential energy of the electron in this state?
(c) Which of the answers above would change if the choice of the zero of potential energy is changed?
(a) Total energy of the electron, E = −3.4 eV
Kinetic energy of the electron is equal to the negative of the total energy.
= − (− 3.4) = +3.4 eV
Hence, the kinetic energy of the electron in the given state is +3.4 eV.
(b) Potential energy (U) of the electron is equal to the negative of twice of its kinetic energy.
= − 2 × 3.4 = − 6.8 eV
Hence, the potential energy of the electron in the given state is − 6.8 eV.
(c) The potential energy of a system depends on the reference point taken. Here, the potential energy of the reference point is taken as zero. If the reference point is changed, then the value of the potential energy of the system also changes. Since total energy is the sum of kinetic and potential energies, total energy of the system will also change.
If Bohr’s quantisation postulate (angular momentum = nh/2π) is a basic law of nature, it should be equally valid for the case of planetary motion also. Why then do we never speak of quantisation of orbits of planets around the sun?
We never speak of quantization of orbits of planets around the Sun because the angular momentum associated with planetary motion is largely relative to the value of Planck’s constant (h). The angular momentum of the Earth in its orbit is of the order of 1070h. This leads to a very high value of quantum levels n of the order of 1070. For large values of n, successive energies and angular momenta are relatively very small. Hence, the quantum levels for planetary motion are considered continuous.
Admissions Open for 2025-26